Semantic A-translation and Super-consistency entail Classical Cut Elimination

نویسندگان

  • Lisa Allali
  • Olivier Hermant
چکیده

We show that if a theory R defined by a rewrite system is super-consistent, the classical sequent calculus modulo R enjoys the cut elimination property, which was an open question. For such theories it was already known that proofs strongly normalize in natural deduction modulo R, and that cut elimination holds in the intuitionistic sequent calculus modulo R. We first define a syntactic and a semantic version of Friedman’s Atranslation, showing that it preserves the structure of pseudo-Heyting algebra, our semantic framework. Then we relate the interpretation of a theory in the A-translated algebra and its A-translation in the original algebra. This allows to show the stability of the super-consistency criterion and the cut elimination theorem.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Semantic A-translations and Super-Consistency Entail Classical Cut Elimination

We show that if a theory R defined by a rewrite system is super-consistent, the classical sequent calculus modulo R enjoys the cut elimination property, which was an open question. For such theories it was already known that proofs strongly normalize in natural deduction modulo R, and that cut elimination holds in the intuitionistic sequent calculus modulo R. We first define a syntactic and a s...

متن کامل

A Simple Proof That Super-Consistency Implies Cut Elimination

We give a simple and direct proof that super-consistency implies cut elimination in deduction modulo. This proof can be seen as a simplification of the proof that super-consistency implies proof normalization. It also takes ideas from the semantic proofs of cut elimination that proceed by proving the completeness of the cut free calculus. In particular, it gives a generalization, to all super-c...

متن کامل

A Semantic Normalization Proof for System T

Semantics methods have been used to prove cut elimination theorems for a long time. It is only recently that they have been extended to prove strong normalization results. For instance using the notion of super-consistency that is a semantic criterion for theories expressed in deduction modulo implying strong normalization. However, the strong normalization of System T has always been reluctant...

متن کامل

A Semantic Normalization Proof for Inductive Types

Semantics methods have been used to prove cut elimination theorems for a long time. It is only recently that they have been extended to prove strong normalization results. For instance using the notion of super-consistency that is a semantic criterion for theories expressed in deduction modulo implying strong normalization. However, the strong normalization of System T has always been reluctant...

متن کامل

A Semantic Proof that Reducibility Candidates entail Cut Elimination

Two main lines have been adopted to prove the cut elimination theorem: the syntactic one, that studies the process of reducing cuts, and the semantic one, that consists in interpreting a sequent in some algebra and extracting from this interpretation a cut-free proof of this very sequent. A link between those two methods was exhibited by studying in a semantic way, syntactical tools that allow ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • CoRR

دوره abs/1401.0998  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2014